- #MeToo – Is it right way to seek justice?
- We must listen to the victims: Huma Qureshi on #MeToo
- Sexual predators are all around us: Jacqueline Fernandez
- #MeeToo: Sexual harassment case against Pachauri heads to trial
- #MeToo: Anu Malik No Longer A Part Of Indian Idol 10
- Whether #MeToo stays or fizzles out, people will be wary: Neena Gupta
- Women should’ve shared #MeToo stories immediately: Bappi Lahiri
- India’s #MeToo start of wrong practice: BJP MP backs Nana Patekar
- #MeToo movement not about gender, it’s about right over wrong: Deepika
- Sushmita Sen on #MeToo: Society must listen to victims
- Top RSS functionary says he ‘liked’ Facebook official’s post ..
Today in the world of liberal thinking, we have moved onto having equal rights, LGBT rights, gender justice and what not. India, being a conservative country, has opened its arms wide open to keep up to world’s development through legislation, judicial decisions and especially, through social movements.
Social media had gained so much popularity in the recent years that it has become an integral part of our lives. People share their personal posts to professional matters. Social media has also become a trendsetter and a perfect platform to pitch popularity, seek justice, run a social campaign, spread awareness and so much more.
Recently, #MeeToo campaign has erupted over the internet with lots of saddening posts filled with experiences of sexual abuse, molestation and exploitation with our female members of the society. We all feel that such accuses should be punished with rightful punishments and justice should be sort to the females for such wistful experiences which have caused both mental and physical agony. But as a law student, I have always been taught that ‘an accused is not guilty until its proven’, then how far is it right to judge a person with such allegations? How about if a person is proven not guilty in the court of law and the allegation mere false and bogus? How far is it right to have a media trial rather than seeking justice through a proper course? Isn’t it unfair and unjust for both accused and his family that would face a social boycott and professional losses?
All of the above questions should be considered while determining a person guilty of an offence. Also, I have come across some stories which date back to a decade or half and with the #MeeToo campaign; it is coming forward on social media. Another question comes that, why it took people to share such dreadful experiences and pessimistic stories after a decade or half? We do understand how hard it is for a woman to gather courage and report such incidents even to her family and friends but instead of sharing with her near and dear ones or filing a police complain, how far is it right to share such experiences to social media directly after a haul of such many years?
To draw your attention to incidents pertaining to false accusations against men to talking about men rights I have recourse to few articles which are discussed below:
A Times of India article, “Women faces trial for false rape charge” gives us another side of the coin. In this, it was mentioned how a women, a rape victim (as alleged), after the trial was found making “mockery” of our legal arrangement by filing a false rape case.
In an article by Hindustan Times, titled as “When women misuse laws made to protect them”. It provides some instances where false ‘rape’ accusations are made by females just to blackmail and seek revenge. It also has a remark made by Indu Subash, who works for men rights that “There is no dearth of cases in which fake allegations are levelled against men for ulterior motives. Our helpline remains flooded with such complaints in which the real victims are men”.
It does not limit to false rape charges but also against husband on false accusation for cruelty. In July 2005, the Supreme Court admitted that in many instances complaints under the Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code are not bona fide and have oblique motives. The court added that acquittal in such cases doesn’t erase the suffering the defendant has to go through, which is compounded by adverse media coverage. The court also directed the legislature to find ways to check such false cases.
Another article published by PRI, it was mentioned that “Indian court rules that men need protection from women making unsubstantiated domestic harassment claims”, also mentioning that a panel of the Supreme Court called women’s misuse of the provision “legal terrorism”.
Last Friday, Bombay High Court has also made a remark regarding #MeToo campaign, “The movement should not be misused. It is for the victims and not for anybody else. This is why there is a need for guidelines to be set on the issue,” Justice Kathawalla said.
Coming to the conclusion, the beauty of law is that it is equal for each and everyone despite our religion, caste, colour, gender or status, so we must seek justice through law and by proper procedure. Media trials are not the appropriate medium to seek justice as it does not give justice to anyone except being judged by our society and it is for both men and women. Men too fall prey to false acquisitions with malafide intent and the only equality, our society follow is, judging people through such posts and statements. It doesn’t really mean all men are innocent and every such incident is false and with a hasty intent but some of them are so to ensure an innocent not suffer proper course to justice should be sort. And the culprit should be punished, whether men committing any offence or women making false allegations, strict action should be sort against such people.